Skip to main content

Day Ten

 Alright, time for some brutal honesty on the algo trading journey. You know how in my last post, I talked about scaling back my backtesting to focus on just US news releases on EUR/USD? Well, I took my own advice, doubled down on the manual testing, and the results are in.

And, wow.

My strategy SUCKS!

Seriously, it's been a real dose of humble pie.

The Unforgiving Truth of Focused Backtesting

I picked 6 key US news releases between April 29th, 2025, and May 7th, 2025, for my targeted manual backtesting. These were high-impact events that, in theory, my news straddle strategy should have capitalized on.

The result? All 6 trades would have stopped out at a 10-pip loss. Every single one. That's a perfect losing streak in under two weeks of market data.

Then, just to get an even fresher perspective, I also manually backtested using TradingView for the last week of May 2025. (Quick side note: TradingView's replay feature is so much better for manual backtesting than what I was using on TradingStation – a huge quality of life improvement!). And the results there? Three more trades, and they were also shocking! More losses, more clear evidence that my current strategy, as is, simply isn't cutting it.

Why This is Actually Good News

Now, you might think this is discouraging. And honestly, for a moment, it is. There's a natural inclination to feel a bit dejected when something you've put effort into building proves ineffective.

But here's the crucial mindset shift: this is actually fantastic news!

  1. I Found Out NOW: Imagine if I had somehow managed to automate this strategy and put real money on the line without this rigorous manual testing. Those 10-pip losses would be real losses. Discovering these flaws now, in the backtesting phase, costs me nothing but time and a bruised ego.
  2. Specific Flaws Revealed: Because I narrowed down my testing focus, I'm getting crystal clear data on why it's failing. It's not a vague "it just doesn't work." I can see exactly where the stops are being hit, how the price reacts around the news, and what kind of market conditions are consistently wiping me out.
  3. Iteration is Key: This isn't a failure; it's data. It means my hypothesis about how news straddles work needs a serious re-evaluation. It forces me back to the drawing board, not to give up, but to refine, rethink, and improve. My previous post talked about needing to refine; this past week's testing has given me a very loud and clear message about what needs refining.

This is the grind of algo trading. It's not about building one perfect strategy; it's about constant iteration, testing, and learning from failure. My news straddle strategy isn't dead; it's just entered a very necessary, very painful, but ultimately very valuable, redesign phase.

Has your backtesting ever given you such a harsh, but necessary, reality check? Share your stories of strategy humbling in the comments!

Happy (and now more informed) algo trading,

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Day Five

 Hello fellow aspiring algorithmic traders! Today, I want to talk about two critical, yet often overlooked, aspects of developing an algo trading strategy: backtesting libraries and the looming question of deployment , especially when you're a dedicated Linux user like me. Diving into Backtesting: QStrader vs. backtestpy So, my current focus is really on nailing down the backtesting of my news straddle strategy. It's one thing to have a great idea; it's another entirely to prove it stands a chance against historical market data. For this, I've been getting my hands dirty with a couple of prominent Python backtesting libraries: QStrader and backtestpy . Both libraries offer fantastic functionalities, but they approach the problem from slightly different angles. QStrader is a comprehensive framework that provides a more structured and object-oriented approach. It's great for building sophisticated event-driven backtesting systems, which can accurately simulate ma...

Day Four

 Sometimes, the most productive days in algo trading aren't spent coding or backtesting, but simply absorbing knowledge. Today was one of those quieter days for me, and I finally carved out some dedicated time to dive into a new resource. Diving into TradingCafe I've finally cracked open the TradingCafe book ! I've heard a lot about it in various trading circles, and I'm excited to start digging into its insights. It's easy to get caught up in the technical aspects of building bots and analysing data, but understanding the underlying market dynamics and trading psychology is just as crucial. I'm hoping to gain some fresh perspectives and perhaps even discover new strategy ideas from its pages. It's a reminder that continuous learning is paramount in this ever-evolving field. Babypips School of Pipsology: A Game-Changer! On another exciting note, I made a fantastic discovery today: the Babypips School of Pipsology is available in audio format! Seriously, wha...

Welcome

  Hello world Welcome to  Quant Quest , my brand new journal documenting my foray into the fascinating and sometimes daunting world of algorithmic forex trading. As a relative beginner in the realm of automated strategies and quantitative analysis, this blog will serve as my logbook, my testing ground, hopefully, my chronicle of progress (and perhaps a few entertaining missteps along the way) but more importantly, my accountability. In this blog, you can expect to find: My learning journey:  The concepts I’m grappling with, the resources I’m exploring, and the “aha!” (and “oh no!”) moments I encounter. Algorithm development:  Snippets of code (when I dare to share!), the logic behind my strategies, and the evolution of my bots. Backtesting results:  The cold, hard numbers (and my attempts to interpret them!). Live trading experiments:  The nervous excitement (and potential heartbreak) of deploying my creations in the real market. My thoughts and reflections...